Inbetween Analogue and Digital: Growing Up in the Digital Revolution

I was recently thinking about something which turned into a really interesting conversation with Justine about something that affects both of us, (and perhaps some of you), not just in our art practices but also our personal lives and preferences and that something is the particular time span in which we were born and the technological advancements during our life time.


If a Digital Immigrant is someone who has come into the digital world (perhaps my parent’s generation; already adults during the switchover from analogue to digital), and a Digital Native is the generation of my son, born into a world where digital technology already exists and is commonplace in the home, then what is the term for those of us who are in between? For those of us born between the early 70s to the mid 80s, slap bang in the changeover from analogue to digital?


We are not entirely analogue, nor entirely digital, as we grew up, technology grew up with us, going from something hardly anybody had or even seen, to something commonplace, maturing and changing just as we ourselves were. We speak ‘tech’ fluently and use it as a part of everyday life with little or no struggle, however, we have a strong ( pehaps nostalgic) appreciation for the handmade, the one-off.


The art friends I have spoken to about digital art while agreeing that digital art can take as long as, be as beautiful and relevant as and need as large a skill base as the hand or physically made, still favour the handmade object over the digital product, I don’t think it is just to do with the issues surrounding the multiple ( which is the original and which is the copy, and how do you put a value on something that can be repeated infinitely), but it is like we put more value on something that is physically pen to paper rather than stylus to tablet. I wonder if this weighting is because our lives, our formative years were spent in the changeover between analogue and digital technologies.


As a child many of us were relatively low-fi, in my house the technologies available for recreation were the radio, record and tape player and the occasional television – not a permanent fixture in my house. That childhood is relatively similar to that of the previous generation, that of our parents; there were analogue technologies but they were few and there was no reliance on them to be our constant companions and keep us amused most of the time.


However as we grew up, so did technology, videos and the video-camera became more commonplace (not in my house but in some of my more affluent friends’ families), and then came the massive shift from analogue to digital, from tape to CD, during this time parallel importing came into it’s own and so technology became accessible and affordable. Then technology came in leaps and bounds, during my teens people began using expensive brick-like cellphones, which rapidly shrank and became smartphones, large boxy computers shrank into laptops and the everyday use of the internet (another piece of witchcraft I would never have dreamed of in my childhood) became commonplace.


What I wonder is how this shift in technology and being in the generation that experienced that shift has affected us. We are the mediators between Digital Natives and the older Digital Immigrants, we can access and appreciate both digital and analogue technologies and remember what it was like both pre and post digital revolution, able to see the drawbacks and benefits of each system.


We are like a Digital Immigrant in that we have learned to use technology as it comes to us, but different too because we never experienced adolescent or adult life entirely without it. We are also like Digital Natives in that we can easily adapt to the fast paced shifting and screen based existence that the Digital Native generations are born into, but different again too because we perhaps aren’t as reliant on it, or take it all with a grain of salt. We are pieces of both but not entirely either.


This inbetween-ness, this mediating position between the two gives us a different outlook from either the immigrant or the native, we are able to see both sides of the fence at one, able to navigate between the two modes as necessary, able to see the crossovers and the spaces between them. We‘re able to mediate between the Immigrants and the Natives and have a place in each culture, combining elements of either to see the possibilities of both.



7 thoughts on “Inbetween Analogue and Digital: Growing Up in the Digital Revolution

  1. Pingback: Literature Review: Get Back to Where You Once Belonged by Marvin Heiferman. | Rhubarb Pyjamas

  2. Bit of a quote from the book I have just read; Life on the Screen by Sherry Turkle:
    Every era constructs it’s own metaphors for psychological well-being. Not so long ago, stability was socially valued and culturally reinforced. Rigid gender roles, repetitive labour, the expectation of being in one kind of job or remaining in one town over a lifetime, all of these made consistency central to definitions of health. But these social stable worlds have broken down. In our time, health is described in terms of fluidity rather than stability. What matters most now is our ability to adapt and change – to new jobs, new career directions, new gender roles, new technologies. (Turkle, 1995, p. 254).

    This maybe is the viewpoint from our parents generation, such a huge change for them from stable to variable, and we are the children of these pioneering, shapeshifting people. Their generation was the first to experience the social shift of singular to multiple. Perhaps this has given us, the next generation on, an appreciation for the stability or analog existence of our grandparents? (again,nostalgia based?).

    • think it is both nostalgia based for us and posible them (the older folk). I belief each generation envies the previous or current for a variety of reasons – we all long for stability and change. Often these do not go hand in hand.
      It interested me that our health is now measure via fluidity, many people do not cope with change well, does this makes us a les healthy society?

      • I was also wondering that. But than I thought “compared to what?” Mental health mustn’t have been any better in previous generations, perhaps it just went more unreported or unhappiness was hidden, or not talked about. How can the happiness of one generation be compared to that of other generations?

      • good question, this is also true for: How can you compare my happiness to another person of similar age? We are both alive in same era, born from same era, so theoretically should have same attitudes. The trouble is we as human’s always compare. I think it helps to place us, ground us into who we are. I think comparisons often lead to invalid answers, especially where emotion is involved.

  3. Pingback: The In-between Generation | rosearch

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s